Dr.Peter McCollough speaking at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
October 2, 2021.

http://www.theaustraliaproject.org/

http://www.commonlaw-australia.com/

https://t.me/s/TheAustraliaProject

Fair Work Decision on Vaccine Mandates

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2021fwcfb6015.htm?fbclid=IwAR1zNW98P5JaZmWxUmiDgCpzTOkpTXDyGhfXK7RBn7UDd4–UEDwwfUnXZ4

Begin Vaccine text at

PART 2 –VACCINE REQUIREMENTS IN RELATION TO COVID [101]

[173] In summary, the powers to make PHOs cannot lawfully be used in a way that is punitive, and human rights are not suspended during states of emergency or disaster. The current PHOs have moved well past the minimum necessary to achieve public health aims, and into the realm of depravation. It is not proportionate, reasonable or necessary to “lock out” those who are unvaccinated and remove their ability to work or otherwise contribute to society. PHOs, by their nature, are designed and intended for short term use in the event of an emergency or crisis. They are not intended to be an ongoing vehicle to enforce significant depravations of our civil liberties. The COVID pandemic started over 20 months ago. The time is fast approaching where the reliance on PHO’s will no longer be justified on public health grounds, particularly where there is such a significant intrusion on individual liberties.

174] It is highly likely that the dismissal of an employee who fails to have the COVID vaccine will breach the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DD Act). The DD Act makes it unlawful to discriminate against a person, including in employment and in accessing services, because of a disability.

[175] The definition of disability in s.4 of the DD Act includes “the presence in the body of organisms capable of causing disease or illness”. It includes a disability that presently exists, or previously existed but no longer exists, or may exist in the future, or is imputed to a person.

Final comments

[179] Research in the context of COVID-19 has shown that many who are ‘vaccine-hesitant’ are well educated, work in the health care industry and have questions about how effective the vaccines are in stopping transmission, whether they are safe to take during pregnancy, or if they affect fertility. 37 A far safer and more democratic approach to addressing vaccine hesitancy, and therefore increasing voluntary vaccination uptake, lies in better education, addressing specific and often legitimate concerns that people may hold, and promoting genuine informed consent. It does not lie in censoring differing opinions or removing rights and civil liberties that are fundamental in a democratic nation. It certainly does not lie in the use of highly coercive, undemocratic and unethical mandates.

[180] The statements by politicians that those who are not vaccinated are a threat to public health and should be “locked out of society” and denied the ability to work are not measures to protect public health. They are not about public health and not justified because they do not address the actual risk of COVID. These measures can only be about punishing those who choose not to be vaccinated. If the purpose of the PHOs is genuinely to reduce the spread of COVID, there is no basis for locking out people who do not have COVID, which is easily established by a rapid antigen test. Conversely, a vaccinated person who contracts COVID should be required to isolate until such time as they have recovered.

[181] Blanket rules, such as mandating vaccinations for everyone across a whole profession or industry regardless of the actual risk, fail the tests of proportionality, necessity and reasonableness. It is more than the absolute minimum necessary to combat the crisis and cannot be justified on health grounds. It is a lazy and fundamentally flawed approach to risk management and should be soundly rejected by courts when challenged.

[182] All Australians should vigorously oppose the introduction of a system of medical apartheid and segregation in Australia. It is an abhorrent concept and is morally and ethically wrong, and the anthesis of our democratic way of life and everything we value.

[183] Australians should also vigorously oppose the ongoing censorship of any views that question the current policies regarding COVID. Science is no longer science if it a person is not allowed to question it.

[184] Finally, all Australians, including those who hold or are suspected of holding “anti-vaccination sentiments”, are entitled to the protection of our laws, including the protections afforded by the Fair Work Act. In this regard, one can only hope that the Majority Decision is recognised as an anomaly and not followed by others.

Full length version

COUNTRY BY COUNTRY DEATH CHART BEFORE AND AFTER THE VAX ROLLOUT STARTED – MAKES THE GENOCIDE OBVIOUS

https://patents.justia.com/patent/11107588

Methods and systems of prioritizing treatments, vaccination, testing and/or activities while protecting the privacy of individuals

Patent History

Patent number: 11107588
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 30, 2020
Date of Patent: Aug 31, 2021
Patent Publication Number: 20210082583
Inventors: Gal Ehrlich (Ramat-Gan), Maier Fenster (Petach-Tikva)
Primary Examiner: Anh V La
Application Number: 17/106,279
ClassificationsCurrent U.S. Class: Tracking Location (e.g., Gps, Etc.) (340/539.13)
International Classification: G06Q 10/00 (20120101); G16H 50/80 (20180101); H04W 4/02 (20180101); G16H 50/30 (20180101); G06N 7/00 (20060101); H04W 4/029 (20180101);